Your responses point to a mature, data-led approach with strong visibility, demand-responsive systems and long-term planning already in place. The focus now shifts to sustaining performance, staying ahead of tightening regulation, and finding the marginal gains that keep you ahead.
Even high-performing estates benefit from a fresh perspective and specialist support to maintain momentum.
Energy Efficiency
Learn More
0–2: Energy use is largely uncontrolled, with limited visibility and systems running on fixed schedules. There’s strong potential for quick, low-cost savings.
3–4: Some good practices in place but applied inconsistently across the estate. Tightening scheduling and BMS optimisation would unlock further gains.
5–6: Energy use is well-controlled, demand-responsive and actively optimised. Focus now on sustaining performance and marginal improvements.
Carbon vs Cost Alignment
Learn More
0–2: Carbon and cost are managed separately, with little link between initiatives and measurable savings. A clearer, joined-up approach would help.
3–4: Some connection between carbon and cost, but reporting is ad hoc. Formalising how savings are measured would strengthen the business case.
5–6: Carbon and cost are tracked together and reported consistently, with low-cost optimisation prioritised before capital spend.
Building Performance & Occupant Experience
Learn More
0–2: Comfort conditions are inconsistent or unmonitored, and occupant feedback isn’t routinely captured. Both performance and satisfaction could improve.
3–4: Conditions are monitored in some areas and feedback is collected, but not always acted on. More consistent, demand-driven control would help.
5–6: Conditions are consistently maintained, systems respond to real demand, and occupant feedback is regularly reviewed and actioned.
Data & Visibility
Learn More
0–2: Decisions rely largely on manual reads, estimates or assumptions, with issues handled reactively. Better data would sharpen every other area.
3–4: Some automated data and alerting in place, but not yet complete or fully data-led. Closing the gaps would enable more confident decisions.
5–6: Live dashboards, data-led decisions and proactive monitoring mean inefficiencies are spotted and resolved before they become costly.
Strategy & Long-term Planning
Learn More
0–2: Little formal roadmap, with short-term budgets and long-term goals poorly aligned and limited regulatory planning. A clear strategy is the priority.
3–4: A high-level plan exists with partial budget alignment and some regulatory awareness. Adding detail and milestones would strengthen delivery.
5–6: A detailed, phased roadmap with aligned budgets and proactive planning for tightening regulation and rising energy costs.
Note: This self-assessment is designed to give you an indicative snapshot of your estate’s energy performance, not a formal audit or professional advice. Scores are based on your own responses and should be treated as a starting point for discussion rather than a definitive measure. We’d always recommend speaking with a qualified energy and sustainability professional before acting on your results.